USPTO serial 77420255
PRO VIGIL PROVIDING PROACTIVE PROTECTION WWW.PRO-VIGIL.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3697527Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 20, 2009
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PRO VIGIL PROVIDING PROACTIVE PROTECTION WWW.PRO-VIGIL.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jayne Conway Hunter
Jayne Conway Hunter Hunter Law Firm, PLLC300 East Kingston AvenueSuite 200Charlotte, NC 28226Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Building security systems comprising software and hardware for providing picture, video, alarm status, building plans, and other information to a remote station | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2006 |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, providing access to pictures, video, alarm status, building plans and other building and security information at a remote station | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2006 |
| 045 | Electronic monitoring services for security purposes in the field of remotely securing construction sites; Security services, namely, providing electronic alerts notifying of a changed status or condition of a sensing device via the Internet | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pro-Vigil, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pro-Vigil, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pro-Vigil, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named PRO VIGIL PROVIDING PROACTIVE PROTECTION WWW.PRO-VIGIL.COM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 20, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 28, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 4, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 15, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |