USPTO serial 77420279
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur S. Rose
ARTHUR S. ROSE KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN STREET, FOURTEENTH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT AND PROMOTIONAL SERVICES; PROVIDING A WEBSITE THAT PROMOTES AND SHOWCASES INDEPENDENT ARTISTS IN THE FIELDS OF FASHION, ART, MUSIC AND ENTERTAINMENT; DIGITAL DISTRIBUTION SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF FASHION, ART, MUSIC, ENTERTAINMENT, FILM AND VIDEO; LICENSING OF WEB ENGINES; STATISTICAL REPORTING SERVICES, SUBMISSIONS SERVICES FOR CONFERENCES, FESTIVALS AND OTHER EVENTS SEEKING ENTERTAINMENT, PROVIDING EVENT LISTINGS FOR ARTISTS, AND MARKETING SERVICES, ALL IN THE FIELDS OF FASHION, ART, MUSIC, ENTERTAINMENT, FILM AND VIDEO; PROVIDING OR FACILITATING PROMOTIONAL EVENTS IN THE FIELDS OF FASHION, ART, MUSIC, AND/OR ENTERTAINMENT; PROVIDING REPRESENTATION OF INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS IN THE FIELDS OF FASHION, ART, MUSIC, AND/OR ENTERTAINMENT | ACTIVE | Nov 30, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |