USPTO serial 77421243
BEE SOFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3747372Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 9, 2010
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BEE SOFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer A. Visintine
Jennifer A. Visintine Thompson Coburn LLPOne US Bank PlazaSt. Louis, MO 63101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | eye gel masks; Personal care and beauty products, cosmetics, hair care products, skincare products, and toiletries, namely, bath and facial soaps and gels, bath beads, bath oils, bath bubbles, bath crystals and bath gels, face and body lotions and moisturizers, body butters, moisturizing creams, hand and body balms, pumice stones, skin cleansers, skin fresheners, namely, skin lotions and sprays, skin exfoliators, and skin toners, body, face and foot scrubs, face and body powders, beauty masks, non-medicated mineral and herbal preparations for the bath and for soaking the feet, massage oils and lotions, non-medicated bath salts, shaving cream, shaving lotion and shaving balm, after shave lotion, deodorants for personal use, non-medicated shampoos, hair conditioners, hair cream rinses, hair sprays, hair mousses, hair gels, hair masks, hair and body muds, skin lighteners, sun tanning lotions, sunscreens, self-tanning preparations, nail care preparations, nail polish, nail polish removers, non-medicated diaper rash cream for babies, perfumes, colognes, eau de toilettes, scented sachets, incense, potpourri, scented room sprays, scented linen sprays, lipstick, facial powders, cosmetic foundations, concealers, blushes, lip gloss, lip balm, lip pencils, lip exfoliator, lip tints, lip stains, eye shadows, eye liner pencils, mascaras, makeup remover, eye cream, with environmentally conscience messages and/or slogans | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 12, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Schroeder & Tremayne, Inc.,
- Other trademarks owned by Schroeder & Tremayne, Inc.,
- Other trademarks owned by Schroeder & Tremayne, Inc.,
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named BEE SOFT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 4, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 6, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |