USPTO serial 77421918
SANOCHEMIA CORPORATION USA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SANOCHEMIA CORPORATION USA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia J. Walden
CYNTHIA J. WALDEN FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.PO BOX 1022MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Test reagents for medical diagnosis; contrast media for use with X-ray, ultrasound and MRI medical and veterinary imaging; pharmaceutical products, namely, pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, systemic lupus, vasculitis, cancer, IBD, namely, ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, psoriasis, cutaneous lupus erythematosus, dermatitis, pemphigus, multiple sclerosis, demyelinating autoimmune diseases, Guillain-Barre syndrome neuromyelitis optica, myesthenia gravis, opthalmia, asthma, allergic rhinitis, hypersensitivity, anemia, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, namely, angina pectoris, hypertension, myocardial infarction, CNS-disorders, namely, depression, schizophrenia, muscular spasm and pain, epilepsy | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 22, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 25, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 1, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 8, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 27, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 20, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |