USPTO serial 77422276
NATURA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NATURA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-4011UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded music CDs not containing software for use in providing relaxation | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Beds and bed frames and components thereof, namely, beds, bed frames, mattresses, mattress and bedding foundations, mattress covers, mattress pads, toppers for mattresses; bedding, namely, blankets, sheets, comforter and duvets and covers, quilts, pillows, pillow cases, pillow covers, bed skirts; baby bedding, namely, mattresses, comforters, mattress pads, bumper pads, crib sheets, crib skirts, crib duvets, puddle pads; cotton robes, slippers, aromatherapy sprays, pre-recorded CDs not containing software, containing entertainment providing relaxation; Organically grown wool for use with bedding products, namely, comforters, duvets, pillows, bed covers, blankets, mattresses and mattress pads | ACTIVE | — |
| 022 | Organically grown raw wool for use with bedding products, namely, comforters, duvets, pillows, bed covers, blankets, mattresses and mattress pads | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Mattress covers, mattress pads; bedding, namely, bed blankets, bed sheets, comforter and duvets and duvet covers, quilts, pillow cases, pillow covers, bed skirts; baby bedding, namely, comforters, mattress pads, crib bumper pads, crib sheets, crib skirts, crib duvets, mattress puddle pads | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Natura World Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named NATURA
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 4, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |