USPTO serial 77422838
DOBLER'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEARNEY, COLLEEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DOBLER'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEVIN DALEY
KEVIN DALEY THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY500 SOUTH BUENA VISTA STREETCORPORATE LEGAL - TRADEMARK DEPARTMENTBURBANK, CA 91521-0854Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Beachwear; belts; bottoms; chaps; cloth bibs; coats; cover-ups; dresses; ear muffs; footwear; gloves; Halloween costumes; headwear; hosiery; infantwear; jackets; leotards; lingerie; loungewear; mittens; overalls; pants; ponchos; rainwear; scarves; shirts; shorts; sleepwear; socks; sweaters; sweatshirts; swimwear; ties; tops; underwear; wrist bands | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 29, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |