USPTO serial 77422873
EIZOU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EIZOU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Marina Del Rey, CA
Marina Del Rey, CA
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven Paul Mark
401 East 80th StreetSuite 29BNew York, NY 10075Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Skin care products, namely, facial and body cleansing water; facial masks; skin creams and lotions; skin moisturizers; tinted skin moisturizers; exfoliating cleansing foam for face, hands and feet; skin fresheners and tonics; skin wrinkle day and night creams; skin balms; skin repair systems consisting of exfoliating cleansing foam for face, hands and feet, skin cleansers, skin moisturizing creams and skin balms; creams for use around the eyes; makeup removers; foundation makeup; body care products, namely, toning oils, body masks, body scrubs and body exfoliants; bath products, namely, bath and shower gels and foams; bar soap, liquid soap, scrub soap; bubble bath; body wash; shampoos, hair and skin conditioners | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Nutritional supplements, namely, dietary and nutritionally fortified food products for human consumption adapted for medical use to aid in maintaining healthy skin and aid in healing skin after plastic surgery | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Pre-recorded DVDs and CD-ROMs featuring skin care and nutrition information | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Series of books, newsletters and syndicated columns, all on the subject of skin care and nutrition | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Foods for non-medical use, namely, protein based snack bars | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, coconut water, energy drink, fruit juices, drinking water with vitamins, mineral water and aerated water, all for non-medicinal use | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Online retail store services and mail order catalogue services featuring physical fitness products and apparel including exercise and athletic apparel | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | On-line informational services in the field of skin care | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gill, Aimee
- Other trademarks owned by Gill, Aimee
- Other trademarks owned by Silverberg, Terri
- Other trademarks owned by Silverberg, Terri
- Other trademarks owned by Nadler, Francesca
- Other trademarks owned by Nadler, Francesca
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named EIZOU
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 22, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 11, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 16, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2008 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |