Drawing for THE WEALTHCOUNSEL ASSET TRANSFER SYSTEM

USPTO serial 77424293

THE WEALTHCOUNSEL ASSET TRANSFER SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3857281Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 5, 2010
Examiner
MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with THE WEALTHCOUNSEL ASSET TRANSFER SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David J. Langeland

David J. Langeland TechLaw Ventures, PLLC3290 Mayflower WayLehi, UT 84043UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and instruction manuals sold as a unit for use in the areas of tax planning, estate planning, and estate settlementSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJul 16, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 12, 2017C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Mar 14, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 19, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2015REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 9, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 19, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 2, 2010SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2010REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 30, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 23, 2010CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Aug 20, 2010SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 20, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 23, 2010IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 23, 2010EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 28, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 28, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 28, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 27, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 5, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 15, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 1, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 1, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 1, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 30, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 11, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 16, 2008GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2008GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2008CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jun 23, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Mar 20, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance