USPTO serial 77425757
REASON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LITZAU, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REASON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic recorders for storing and archiving information related to power system faults; Global positioning system (GPS) consisting of computers, computer software, transmitters, receivers, and network interface devices; Electrical components in the nature of protection relays; Electric relays; Electrical energy utilization metering devices complete with related software; Automated process control system, namely, micro-processor based hardware and software used to monitor the status of industrial processes, namely power generation, electrical distribution and oil and gas processing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Product research & development; Engineering services, namely, engineering for the electric power industry; Engineering; Computer software development; Design, development and implementation of software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2011 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |