Drawing for URBAN LEGEND

USPTO serial 77426032

URBAN LEGEND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
COLLIER, DAVID E
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with URBAN LEGEND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dawn Newton

DAWN NEWTON FITZGERALD ABBOTT & BEARDSLEY LLP1221 BROADWAY STE 21OAKLAND, CA 94612-1823UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Grape juice beverages; Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated beverages; Non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; De-alcoholized wines; Non-alcoholized winesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 5, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 5, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 4, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Dec 3, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Nov 30, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Nov 30, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 25, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 25, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 24, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jun 24, 2010DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jun 2, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 2, 2010DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Jun 2, 2010ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Jun 2, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 21, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 19, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Dec 1, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 1, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 10, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 18, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 30, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 30, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 29, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 29, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 28, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Jan 23, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 23, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 27, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Dec 27, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 25, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 25, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 25, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jun 25, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 25, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance