USPTO serial 77426064
SYSTECH INTERNATIONAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 13, 2009
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with SYSTECH INTERNATIONAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia Johnson Walden
Cynthia Johnson Walden Fish & Richardson P.C.PO Box 1022Minneapolis, MN 55440-1022United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | software, namely, a platform that combines vision inspection and line and plant management software used to manufacture packaging; software for managing machine vision inspection applications used in manufacturing packaging; software for optimizing packaging line performance by facilitating the serialization of products using standard and non-standard codes, and for collecting performance metrics and data in connection with the manufacture of packaging; software used in connection with the manufacture of packaging that aggregates performance metrics and key performance indicators across multiple packaging lines and enables serialization of products using standard and nonstandard codes for an entire packaging operation | ACTIVE | Oct 17, 2002 |
| 041 | [ training in the use and operation of computer software that combines vision inspection and line and plant management software used to manufacture packaging; training in the use and operation of computer software for managing machine vision inspection applications used in manufacturing packaging; training in the use and operation of computer software for optimizing packaging line performance by facilitating the serialization of products using standard and non-standard codes, and for collecting performance metrics and data in connection with the manufacture of packaging; training in the use and operation of computer software used in connection with the manufacture of packaging that aggregates performance metrics and key performance indicators across multiple packaging lines and enables serialization of products using standard and nonstandard codes for an entire packaging operation ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | customization of computer components and software used in manufacturing for packaging and optimizing line performance that combines vision inspection and line and plant management software used in manufacturing for packaging; customization of computer hardware and software used for managing machine vision inspection applications used in manufacturing packaging; customization of computer hardware and software for optimizing packaging line performance by facilitating the serialization of products using standard and non-standard codes, and for collecting performance metrics and data in connection with the manufacture of packaging; customization of computer hardware and software used in connection with the manufacture of packaging that aggregates performance metrics and key performance indicators across multiple packaging lines and enables serialization of products using standard and nonstandard codes for an entire packaging operation; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software that combines vision inspection and line and plant management software used to manufacture packaging; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software used for managing machine vision inspection applications used in manufacturing packaging; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software used for optimizing packaging line performance by facilitating the serialization of products using standard and non-standard codes, and for collecting performance metrics and data in connection with the manufacture of packaging; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software used in connection with the manufacture of packaging that aggregates performance metrics and key performance indicators across multiple packaging lines and enables serialization of products using standard and nonstandard codes for an entire packaging operation; computer software consultation for software that combines vision inspection and line and plant management software used to manufacture packaging; computer software consultation for software used for managing machine vision inspection applications used in manufacturing packaging; computer software consultation for software used for optimizing packaging line performance by facilitating the serialization of products using standard and non-standard codes, and for collecting performance metrics and data in connection with the manufacture of packaging; computer software consultation for software used in connection with the manufacture of packaging that aggregates performance metrics and key performance indicators across multiple packaging lines and enables serialization of products using standard and nonstandard codes for an entire packaging operation; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting problems of computer hardware and software that combines vision inspection and line and plant management software used to manufacture packaging; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting problems of computer hardware and software for managing machine vision inspection applications used in manufacturing packaging; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting problems of computer hardware and software for optimizing packaging line performance by facilitating the serialization of products using standard and non-standard codes, and for collecting performance metrics and data in connection with the manufacture of packaging; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting problems of computer hardware and software used in connection with the manufacture of packaging that aggregates performance metrics and key performance indicators across multiple packaging lines and enables serialization of products using standard and nonstandard codes for an entire packaging operation | ACTIVE | Oct 17, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sys-Tech Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sys-Tech Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sys-Tech Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SYSTECH INTERNATIONAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 21, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 21, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 13, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2012 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 28, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 8, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |