USPTO serial 77426159
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Gamagori, Aichi, JP
Gamagori, Aichi, JP
Gamagori, Aichi, JP
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mainak H. Mehta
Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves and Savitch LLP525 B. Street, Suite 2200,San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Housemark for a full line of lens processing machines and components thereof for the production of lenses, namely, lens edgers for retail use, lens edgers for laboratory use, lens conveyance robots, centering devices, drills, pliable cups, drainers, filters, pumps and tank; Housemark for transfer tinting machine for eyeglasses | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Housemark for optical machines in ophthalmic and optometric field, all for laboratory use namely, lensmeters, funduscameras, visual acuity chart projectors; Housemark for measuring machines in ophthalmic and optometric field, all for laboratory use, namely, tracers, blockers; Housemark for eyeglass lenses; Housemark for computers and computer software for use in medical and optometric field, namely, software for connecting ophthalmic equipments, software for communicating eyeglass processing information, software for patient data and clinical information analysis, software for telemetry network, software for informed consent, software for ophthalmic data analysis; Housemark for trial lens sets for eyewear | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Housemark for a full line of ophthalmic and dermatological surgery and treatment instruments and components thereof, namely, lasers, photocagulators, phacoemulsifiers, vitrectomy instruments, intraocular lenses, injectors, keratomes, knives; Housemark for a full line of ophthalmic medical and diagnostic examination machines, instruments and components thereof, all for medical, diagnostic, treatment and therapeutic purposes, namely, refractometers, keratometers, tonometers, refractors, visual acuity charts, visual acuity projectors, corneal topographeres, lensmeters, ultrasonic scanners, pachymeters, ophthalmometers, slitlamps, pupil distance meters, fundus cameras, perimeters, and microscopes; Housemark for trial lens sets, namely, devices consisting of a set of lenses of various dioptric powers intended to be handheld or inserted in a trial frame for vision testing to determine refraction; Hospital supportive equipment, namely, tables and chairs for ophthalmic use | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 22, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 22, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |