Drawing for T-MAX

USPTO serial 77426316

T-MAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3662528Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 4, 2009
Examiner
GUSTASON, ANNE C
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with T-MAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jason L. White

Jason L. White MAYER BROWN LLPP.O. BOX 2828CHICAGO, IL 60690-2828UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer programming services for others, namely, development of data processing programs for others; consulting in the field of telecommunication technology; rental of software and hardware for online access; services of an internet trust center, namely, assurance and administration of digital keys and/or digital certificates; development of data processing programs by order for third parties; professional consultancy in the field of developing data processing technology; web page hosting services; technological operation services, namely, computer services in the nature of computer system administration for others; design services in the field of information technology, computer programming, telecommunications and global communication networks; consulting services in the fields of information technology and computer programming; installation, maintenance and repair of computer softwareSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 28, 2010C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Apr 21, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 15, 2010C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jan 15, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 25, 2009DP1B1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION—
Jun 25, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 23, 2009IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Jun 23, 2009D1BRTEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 24, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 4, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 17, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 12, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 11, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 2, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 23, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 13, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 13, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 28, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 26, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 25, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 26, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Mar 25, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance