USPTO serial 77427055
ADONIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ADONIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Jackson International Trading Company K.D. Bruhl Gesellsch.mbH & Co. KG
8010 Graz, AT
Other trademarks owned by Jackson International Trading Company K.D. Bruhl Gesellsch.mbH & Co. KG
Jackson International Trading Company K.D. Bruhl Gesellsch.mbH & Co. KG
8010 Graz, AT
Other trademarks owned by Jackson International Trading Company K.D. Bruhl Gesellsch.mbH & Co. KG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ursula B. Day
Ursula B. Day Ursula B. Day, Esq708 Third AvenueSuite 1501New York, NY 10017Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jackson International Trading Company K.D. Bruhl Gesellsch.mbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Jackson International Trading Company K.D. Bruhl Gesellsch.mbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ADONIS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 1, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 13, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 27, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 7, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 20, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2009 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 23, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |