USPTO serial 77428549
TRIANGLE OF LIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, JEFFERY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRIANGLE OF LIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard L. Hill
RICHARD L. HILL HILL, JOHNSON & SCHMUTZ4844 NORTH 300 WESTSUITE 300PROVO, UT 84604-5670Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | FOOD BEVERAGES, NAMELY, SEAWEED DRINKS, SEAWEED BASED DRINKS WITH FRUIT FLAVORING; PREPARATIONS FOR MAKING SEAWEED BASED DRINKS WITH FRUIT FLAVORING, DRIED AND PROCESSED EDIBLE SEAWEED | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | FRUIT BEVERAGES, NON-ALCOHOLIC FRUIT EXTRACTS USED IN THE PREPARATION OF BEVERAGES, FRUIT-FLAVORED BEVERAGES AND PREPARATIONS FOR MAKING FRUIT-FLAVORED DRINKS, NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES CONTAINING FRUIT JUICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sakura Properties, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Sakura Properties, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named TRIANGLE OF LIFE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2008 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |