USPTO serial 77429140
SMALL PRODUCTS. BIG RESULTS.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SMALL PRODUCTS. BIG RESULTS.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Divot repair tools for golfers; magic magnets; golf tools, namely, magnetic ball marker hat clips, magnetic ball marker button covers and magnetic ball marker lapel pins; lottery ticket scratchers; golf ball markers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2010 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2010 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2010 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2010 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2010 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 4, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |