USPTO serial 77430459
VLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HELFMAN, JUDITH MICHELLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CHICAGO, IL
CHICAGO, IL
Virtual Law Office Technology, LLC
Wilmington, NC
Other trademarks owned by Virtual Law Office Technology, LLC
Virtual Law Office Technology, LLC
Wilmington, NC
Other trademarks owned by Virtual Law Office Technology, LLC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James M. Harrington
JAMES M. HARRINGTON THE HARRINGTON PRACTICE PLLC10130 MALLARD CREEK ROAD SUITE 110CHARLOTTE, NC 28262UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use in law practice management and managing lawyer-client communications; Design, maintenance, development and updating of computer software; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for use in law practice management and managing lawyer-client communications | ACTIVE | Mar 24, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INFRASTRATEGY L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by INFRASTRATEGY L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Virtual Law Office Technology, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Virtual Law Office Technology, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VLO
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 21, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 11, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 19, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |