Drawing for MIXT UP

USPTO serial 77431046

MIXT UP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HINES, REGINA C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIXT UP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter D. Vogl, Esq.

PETER D. VOGL, ESQ. JONES DAY222 E 41ST ST FL 2NEW YORK, NY 10017-6727UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042computer services, namely, creating an online community for registered users to engage in social and business networking, to form virtual communities, to participate in competitions, to showcase skills, to get feedback from peers; computer services, namely, providing search platforms to allow users to request content from and receive content to a mobile device; computer services, namely providing a website and mobile phone community and wireless device users for facilitating the introduction and interaction of individuals with one another; computer services provided over a global communication information network, mobile phones and other wireless devices wherein users create their own profile, post personal blog entries, and share files; development of wireless entertainment software for use across multiple mobile handsets, carriers and gateways; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable wireless computer entertainment software for use across multiple mobile handsets, carriers, and gateways, namely, software for rating, exchanging and downloading mobile videos, ring tones, graphics and photos; application service provider featuring computer software for use in the design, development and execution of wireless entertainment programs and applications; application service provider, namely, hosting wireless software applications, namely, wireless entertainment applications for multiple carriers; providing data mining information and services in the field of wireless entertainment usage provided to others, namely, provided to multiple wireless carriers; hosting wireless entertainment applications for multiple carriers; computer services, namely, creating an online community for registered users to upload and download audio and video entertainment content from mobile telephones, share that content with one another, and engage in online journaling and blog activities; computer software consultation in the field of mobile communications; computer software development for others in the field of content and service delivery for a mobile communications network; computer software development for others in the field of entertainment programs for use on mobile devices via a mobile communications network; computer software development for others in the field of location services for use on mobile devices via a mobile communications network; computer software development for others in the field of information integration services based on a user profile, preferences schedule and location in order to deliver personalized and event-specific computer software applicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 28, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 26, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 3, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 11, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 23, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 23, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 8, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 3, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 11, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 27, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Mar 28, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance