USPTO serial 77431945
PHOENIXISM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PHOENIXISM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Lebow
MARK LEBOW YOUNG & THOMPSON209 MADISON ST STE 500ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1764UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Bed and table cloths not of paper; fabrics, namely, woven fabric, cotton fabric, cotton-based mixed fabric, hemp-based mixed fabric, wool-based mixed fabric, silk fabric, chemical fiber fabric, mixed fiber fabric, inorganic mixed fiber fabric not including asbestos fiber fabric, curtain fabric, elastic fabric for clothing, elastic yarn mixed fabric, fabric for boots and shoes, fabric of imitation animal skin, fiberglass fabric for textile use, gauze fabric, denim jeans fabric, Jersey fabric, linen fabric, mesh-woven fabric, nylon fabric, ticking fabric, futon ticking fabric, and Hada fabric, namely silk cloth used as a greeting gift among the Zang and Mongol nationalities; textile used as a lining for clothing; filtering cloth, namely, cheese cloth; personal articles of woven textile, namely, face towels; textile towels, handkerchiefs; napkins; quilts; coverings to be affixed to furniture, namely, laminated textiles; place mats of textiles; place mats not of paper; tapestries of textile; curtains of textile or plastic; washing gloves; cloth banners and flags; linen cloth; table linen; household linen; bed linen; bath linen; canvas for embroidery; heat adhesive plaster patches for repairing textile articles | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Shoulder pads for clothing; tissue case covers of textile, zipper tape, namely, hook and eye fastening tape; lace trimming; lace trimming for clothing; edgings and cords for trimming for use on clothing, namely, decorative cords; haberdashery, namely, beads, excluding beads for making jewelry; tea cosies; embroidered emblems; hair clips; buttons for clothing and the like; ornamental buttons for wear; false moustaches | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKIKAISHA SANKEI
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKIKAISHA SANKEI
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named PHOENIXISM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 28, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 18, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 26, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 4, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 4, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |