USPTO serial 77434024
RAPIDROP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 28, 2009
- Examiner
- CASTRO, GIANCARLO
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
Status 703 means Section 8 was accepted and a Section 15 incontestability declaration is pending USPTO review. The registration remains active while Section 15 is processed. Monitor TSDR for Section 15 acceptance (often status 702).
Need help with RAPIDROP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Peterborough, GB
PETERBOROUGH, GB
Peterborough, GB
Peterborough, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew J. Curran
Matthew J. Curran Maine Cernota & Rardin547 Amherst St., 3rd Flr.NASHUA, NH 03063UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Pipes of metal; pipe connections of metal, clack valves of metal not being parts of machines, flap valves of metal not being parts of machines, metal safety valves for controlling the flow of fluids in pipelines not being parts of machines, manually operated metal valves for controlling the flow of fluids not being parts of machines, manually operated metal butterfly and slide valves not being parts of machines, manually actuated non-electric control valves of metal not being parts of machines, metal valves for controlling the flow of gases in pipelines not being parts of machines, metal valves for water pipes not being parts of machines, non-return valves of metal not being parts of machines, stop valves of metal not being parts of machines, valves of metal for industrial installations not being parts of machines, water control valves of metal not being parts of machines, water pipe valves of metal not being parts of machines, flexible hoses of metal for plumbing and sprinkling systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Manual actuators for pneumatic valves, manual actuators for hydraulic valves, actuators incorporating a gear mechanism for pipeline valves, metallic and non-metallic butterfly valves being parts of machines, metallic and non-metallic check valves being parts of machines, check valves of metal being parts of machines, clack valves being parts of machines, flap valves being parts of machines, fluid valves being parts of machines for industrial use, mechanically operated fluid flow control valves being parts of machines, metal valves for shut-off applications being part of machines, non-return valves of metal being parts of machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Electronic butterfly valves for controlling fluid flow, sprinkler systems for fire extinguishing, fire sprinklers | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Valves being parts of sprinkler systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rapidrop Limited
- Other trademarks owned by RAPIDROP GLOBAL LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Rapidrop Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Rapidrop Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named RAPIDROP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2019 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2019 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Apr 21, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 21, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 20, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 28, 2015 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2015 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |