Drawing for ECOSWITCH

USPTO serial 77434315

ECOSWITCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECOSWITCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amir A. Tabarrok

Amir A. Tabarrok Tabarrok & Zahrt LLP60 So. Market St. Suite 1250San Jose, CA 95113UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer hardware; telecommunications equipment, namely, routers, switches, hubs, adapters, media converters, transceivers, repeaters, cables, connectors and integrated circuits for the transmission, distribution, manipulation and retrieval of data, images, video and sound over local area networks, wide area networks and global computer networksACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 11, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 18, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jul 1, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 1, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 27, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 2, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 2, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 25, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 16, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 8, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Feb 8, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Aug 4, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Feb 4, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 14, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 13, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 13, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 13, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 13, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 13, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jan 8, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 8, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 29, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 3, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 2, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Apr 1, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance