Drawing for MEDISLIM

USPTO serial 77435787

MEDISLIM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, MIDGE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEDISLIM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory C. Smith

GREGORY C SMITH GARVEY SMITH NEHRBASS AND NORTH LLC3838 NORTH CAUSEWAY BOULEVARDSUITE 3290METAIRIE, LA 70002

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Medically supervised weight loss and weight reduction program for patientsACTIVEMar 20, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 3, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 3, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 3, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 18, 2012EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 25, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 17, 2011ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 11, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 9, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 8, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 8, 2011EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT—
Oct 8, 2009GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2009GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 14, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 14, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 14, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 15, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 15, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 15, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 4, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 3, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance