CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for KETTLENETICS

USPTO serial 77436248

KETTLENETICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KETTLENETICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan Kirsch

JONATHAN KIRSCH LAW OFFICES OF JONATHAN KIRSCH1880 CENTURY PARK E STE 515LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-1607UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing for wear in exercise, namely, t-shirts and hooded sweatshirtsACTIVE—
028Fitness equipment, namely, exercise weightsACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, providing information, advice and coaching in the field of exercise and physical fitness via websites on a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 17, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 13, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 13, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 18, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 18, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 18, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 19, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 24, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 4, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 16, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 14, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 14, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 14, 2009DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 14, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 12, 2009UNTDREQUEST TO DIVIDE UNTIMELY, REFUSED, OR WITHDRAWN—
Jan 12, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 2, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 30, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 17, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 16, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2008DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2008EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 4, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 3, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance