USPTO serial 77437961
Serial No. 77437961
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 77437961?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George R. Schultz
GEORGE R SCHULTZ SCHULTZ & ASSOCIATES PC5400 LBJ FREEWAYSUITE 1200DALLAS, TX 75240-1067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Non-metal and non-leather key chains and key chain tags | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | Coffee cups; plastic water bottles sold empty; cups; insulated containers for beverage cans for domestic use | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, sweatshirts, t-shirts, polo-shirts, button shirts, jackets, hats, visors, pants and shorts | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | Bottled drinking water; non-alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated beverage | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tigerflow Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Tigerflow Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 18, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 18, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 20, 2009 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 11, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |