CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ATTUNE

USPTO serial 77438194

ATTUNE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WIENER, MICHAEL
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ATTUNE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas A. Polcyn

Thomas A. Polcyn Thompson Coburn LLPOne US Bank PlazaSt. Louis, MO 63101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Yogurt-based beverages; yogurt; yogurt-based spreads; milk; trail mix and snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisinsACTIVE—
031Unprocessed cerealsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 6, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 6, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 5, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 5, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 9, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 5, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 20, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 20, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 5, 2013NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2013DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 27, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 27, 2013DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2013ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 16, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 9, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 9, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Aug 28, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 27, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 22, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 22, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 18, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Feb 16, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 16, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 16, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 30, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2011COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 5, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 15, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 2, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 1, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 31, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 31, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 31, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 16, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 16, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 16, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 14, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 14, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 14, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 13, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 23, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 9, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance