Drawing for RAVENBRICK LLC SMART AND GREEN BUILDING TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 77439549

RAVENBRICK LLC SMART AND GREEN BUILDING TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RAVENBRICK LLC SMART AND GREEN BUILDING TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brad Hattenbach

Brad Hattenbach Dorsey & Whitney LLP370 Seventeenth Street, Suite 4700IP DepartmentDenver, CO 80202-5647

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Building materials, namely, energy efficient double sheet glass and glass panes for windows, translucent windows, spandrels, and wall panels that regulate the flow of heat into buildings or structures, all not of metal; energy efficient colored glass sheets and panes for windows, spandrels, and wall panels that regulate the flow of heat into buildings or structures, all not of metal; energy efficient translucent glass sheets and panes for windows, spandrels, and wall panels that regulate the flow of heat into buildings or structures, all not of metalACTIVE
042Technical energy analysis, namely, data collection and analysis of energy usage and efficiency related to a building or structure's temperature regulation and heating or cooling systemsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 5, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 16, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 3, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 9, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 3, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 24, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 24, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Oct 24, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Oct 24, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Oct 24, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Sep 17, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 16, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 16, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 8, 2008MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Apr 7, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance