Drawing for LIQUIDHD

USPTO serial 77439561

LIQUIDHD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HACK, ANDREA R
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIQUIDHD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lori N. Boatright

Lori N. Boatright Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman LLP12400 Wilshire BoulevardSeventh FloorLos Angeles, CA 90025

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Consumer electronic devices, namely, cameras, television set-top boxes, digital audio and video recorders and players, laser disc recorders and players, MP3 recorders and players, personal stereos, video game machines for use with external display screen or monitor, set-top boxes for use in playing computer games, video game machines for use with televisions and computer monitors, portable and cell phones, and cameras; portable media players, portable and handheld digital electronic devices for recording, organizing, transmitting, manipulating, and reviewing text, data, image, and audio files; cable, satellite and terrestrial digital set top boxes; digital video disk (DVD) players and recorders; digital video home system (VHS) players and recorders; personal video recorders; cable boxes, namely, receivers for receiving cable television; audio video receivers; integrated televisions; television monitors; consumer electronic products, namely, home theater systems; storage boxes in the nature of external computer back up and storage systems with multiple removable RAID drivers; computer hardware; integrated circuits and semiconductors; computer software, namely,computer software interface for use in connecting, controlling and networking a wide variety of personal computer devices, components, and peripherals; computer software for use as an interface between audio/video sources and audio/video repeater devices; computer software for use as an interface between audio/video sources and audio/video monitors; computer software interface for use in connecting, controlling and networking a wide variety of consumer electronic devices, components, and peripherals; connectors, cables, and components thereof, namely, electronic cables, electronic connectors, and electronic computer components; computer peripherals; cable modems, gateway routers in the nature of computer control hardware for connecting to the Internet, and computer multimedia switchesACTIVE
035Association services, namely, promoting the interests of manufacturers of computers, computer hardware, computer software, and consumer electronic devices; promoting the development and adoption of a voluntary digital interface specification that provides an interoperable method of connecting computer and communications hardware, consumer electronics devices, components, and peripheralsACTIVE
042Testing services, namely, product and material testing; testing services, namely, testing the goods of others for the purpose of standards complianceACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 11, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 16, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 16, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 16, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 8, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 21, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 21, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 24, 2009ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Mar 16, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Mar 10, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 18, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 2, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 2, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 21, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 21, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 21, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 21, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 21, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 21, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jan 21, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 21, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 16, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 15, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 15, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 15, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 8, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Apr 7, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance