USPTO serial 77440280
SCHNITZEL KING THE BEST CUTLETS!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCHNITZEL KING THE BEST CUTLETS!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Bar and restaurant services; Cafe and restaurant services; Cafe-restaurants; Cafeteria and restaurant services; Carry-out restaurants; Catering for the provision of food and beverages; Catering in fast-food cafeterias; Catering of food and drinks; Charitable services, namely, providing food to needy persons; Contract food services; Delicatessens; Fast food and non-stop restaurant services; Fast-food restaurants; Fast-food restaurants and snackbars; Food preparation services; Health resort services, namely, providing food and lodging that specialize in promoting patrons' general health and well-being; Hotel and restaurant reservation services; Hotel and restaurant services; Hotel, bar and restaurant services; Hotel, motel, restaurant, bar and catering services; Hotel, restaurant and bar services; Hotel, restaurant and catering services; Ice cream shop services in the nature of a restaurant; Mobile cafe services for providing food and drink; Preparation of food and beverages; Providing advice to tourists and business travelers on hotel and restaurant destinations; Providing of food and drink; Providing of food and drink for patients and guests; Providing on-line reviews of restaurants and hotels; Providing progressive dinner events where participants sample meals and drinks at a series of restaurants; Providing reviews of restaurants; Provision of food and drink in restaurants; Rental of food service equipment; Reservation of restaurants; Restaurant; Restaurant and bar services; Restaurant and cafe services; Restaurant and catering services; Restaurant and hotel services; Restaurant services; Restaurant services featuring sandwiches; Restaurant services, including sit-down service of food and take-out restaurant services; Restaurant, bar and catering services; Restaurants; Restaurants featuring home delivery; Self service restaurants; Self-service restaurants; Serving food and drinks; Serving of food and drink/beverages; Sommelier services, namely, providing advice on wine and wine and food pairing; Take-out restaurant services; Travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for restaurants and meals | ACTIVE | Jun 13, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |