USPTO serial 77442422
SOPÜR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOPÜR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joel B. Rothman
Joel B. Rothman, Esq. Seiden, Alder, Matthewman & Bloch, P.A.7795 NW Beacon Square Blvd., Ste. 201Boca Raton, FL 33487UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Lip balm; Lip balm; Non-medicated lip care preparations; Non-medicated lip protectors; Lip cream; Lip gloss; After-shave balms; Shaving balm; Aromatherapy body care products, namely, body lotion, shower gel, cuticle cream, shampoo, conditioner, non-medicated lip balm, soap, body polish, body and foot scrub and non-medicated foot cream; Beauty creams for body care; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic preparations for body care; Cosmetic preparations for skin renewal; Lotions for face and body care; Non-medicated skin care preparations; Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, creams, lotions, gels, toners, cleaners and peels; Non-medicated skin creams; Shaving spritz in the nature of a moisturizing solution for shaving; Skin cleansers; Skin cleansing cream; Skin cleansing lotion; Skin conditioners; Skin creams; Skin creams in liquid and in solid form; Skin lotion; Skin masks; Skin moisturizer; Skin moisturizer masks; Skin texturizers; Skin toners; Skin whitening creams; Skin whitening preparations; Soaps for body care; Sun care lotions; Topical skin sprays for cosmetic purposes; Wrinkle removing skin care preparations; Skin emollients; Skin gels for accelerating, enhancing or extending tans; Skin lighteners; Skin lightening creams; Skin lotions; Skin soap; Non-medicated preparations all for the care of skin, hair and scalp; Non-medicated stimulating lotions for the skin; Non-medicated sun care preparations; Skin abrasive preparations; Skin and body topical lotions, creams and oils for cosmetic use; Skin bronzing creams; Skin care preparations, namely, body balm; Skin clarifiers; Natural essential oils; Natural mineral make-up; Lip liner; Lip polisher; Compacts containing make-up; Cosmetics and make-up; Eye make-up; Eye make-up remover; Facial make-up; Make up foundations; Make up removing preparations; Make-up for the face and body; Make-up foundations; Make-up kits comprised of organic make up; Make-up pencils; Make-up powder; Make-up preparations; Make-up remover; Make-up removing milk, gel, lotions and creams; Make-up removing preparations | PARTIALLY PAID | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2008 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |