CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SOLESS

USPTO serial 77443045

SOLESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, REBECCA A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOLESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

C. Bruce Hamburg

C BRUCE HAMBURG JORDAN AND HAMBURG LLP122 E 42ND STRM 4000NEW YORK, NY 10168-0069

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical preparations for industrial use sold other than for the preparation of artificial and synthetic resins and plastics, namely, phenols, organic acids and organic salts and mildew proofing agentsACTIVE—
011Waste water purification installations in the nature of decomposition and cutback installations for treating organic waste mud resulting from processing drainage from factories, market places, and sewage treatment plants which reduce the waste mud by promoting the waste mud's activation by adding chemical preparations and carrying out aeration processing; water purifying installations; waste water purification units for purifying waste mud resulting from processing drainage from factories, marketplaces and sewage treatment plants; waste water purification tanks for industrial purposes; septic tanks for industrial purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 27, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 26, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 24, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 8, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2011TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Apr 8, 2011OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 8, 2011OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
May 12, 2009OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 6, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 18, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 4, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 4, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 23, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 23, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 22, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 22, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance