Drawing for HUANG FEI HONG

USPTO serial 77443405

HUANG FEI HONG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HUANG FEI HONG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Alumit

JOHN ALUMIT PATEL & ALUMIT, PC16830 VENTURA BLVD., SUITE 360ENCINO, CA 91436UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030(Based on Intent to Use) Sugar; Honey; Propolis for food purposes; Pastries; Instant noodles; Dumplings; Processed cereal-based food to be used as a breakfast food, snack food or ingredient for making other foods; Flour; Flour for food; Soya flour; Tapioca flour; Cooking salt; Soy sauce; Vinegar; Seasonings; Spices; Tomato sauce; Pickle relish; Relish; Soy bean paste; Meat gravies; Chili paste for use as a seasoning; Sauces; Food leavening agents(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Sugar; Honey; Propolis for food purposes; Pastries; Instant noodles; Dumplings; Processed cereal-based food to be used as a breakfast food, snack food or ingredient for making other foods; Flour; Flour for food; Soya flour; Tapioca flour; Cooking salt; Soy sauce; Vinegar; Seasonings; Spices; Tomato sauce; Pickle relish; Relish; Soy bean paste; Meat gravies; Chili paste for use as a seasoning; Sauces; Food leavening agentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 29, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 29, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 15, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 23, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 23, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 23, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 19, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Apr 11, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance