Drawing for XIRT

USPTO serial 77444437

XIRT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XIRT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Grace Han Stanton

GRACE HAN STANTON PERKINS COIE LLP1201 3RD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for on-line trading services to facilitate the purchase and sale of services and goods by others via a computer network and providing evaluative feedback and ratings of sellers' services and goods, the value and prices of sellers' services and goods, buyers' and sellers' performance, delivery, and overall trading experience in connection therewith; computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network; computer database management software featuring information in the field of consumer services and goods and business services and goods; computer software for providing an on-line database in the field of consumer services and goods and business services and goods; computer database software for storing, managing, tracking and analyzing data in the field of marketing, promotion, sales, consumer services and goods, and business services and goodsACTIVE—
035On-line trading services in which seller or buyer posts products and services to be sold or auctioned and sales or bidding is done via a computer network to facilitate the sale of services and goods by others; providing a website featuring evaluative feedback and ratings of the consumer and business services and goods of third party buyers, third party sellers and others, the value and prices of the consumer and business services and goods of third party buyers, third party sellers and others, buyers' and sellers' performance, sellers' arrangement of delivery, and overall trading experience in connection therewith; providing space on websites for the advertising of goods and services of third party buyers, third party sellers and others over global and wide area networks and the Internet; providing an on-line computer database featuring consumer and business product and service informationACTIVE—
042Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for storing, managing, tracking and analyzing data in the field of marketing, promotion, sales, consumer services and goods, and business services and goods; computer services, namely, designing, implementing, and maintaining computer software for others; providing temporary use of online customizable non-downloadable software for the creation, maintenance, and modification of computer networks that provide access to a wide variety of topics; providing computer hardware and software design and development services in the field of advertising; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer communications software for facilitating communication between users over global and wide area networks and the Internet; consulting services relating to all of the foregoingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 21, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 21, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 17, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 25, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 5, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 20, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 20, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 10, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 10, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 8, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 16, 2009GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 16, 2009GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 16, 2009CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 31, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 31, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 31, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance