USPTO serial 77444484
RESPONSIBLE SWEETENING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RESPONSIBLE SWEETENING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Bakery products, namely, sweet bakery goods; candies; sugarfree sweets; sugarless sweets; sweets; vegan cakes; vegan cheesecake; vegan cookies; vegan cup cakes; vegan pies; cookie dough; cookie mixes; cookies; cookies and crackers; muffin mixes; muffins; cake doughs; cake mixes; cakes; cup cakes; fruit cakes; ice-cream cakes; snack cakes; sponge cakes; chocolate; chocolate bars; chocolate candies; chocolate chips; chocolate syrup; cinnamon rolls; rolled oats; donuts; granola; granola snacks; granola-based snack bars; cereal based energy bars; cereal based snack food; cereal-based snack foods; processed cereal-based food to be used as a breakfast food, snack food or ingredient for making other foods; processed cereals; ready to eat, cereal derived food bars; ready-to-eat cereals; sorbet; sherbets; cones for ice cream; edible fruit ices; edible ices; flavored ices; frozen yoghurt; fruit ice; ice cream; ice cream drinks; ice cream sandwiches; ice creams; ice-cream; iced tea; icing mixes; Italian ice; sugar; sugar substitutes; flavored, sweetened gelatin desserts; natural sweetener; flavored and sweetened gelatins; bakery desserts; frozen dessert consisting of fruit and cream or cream substitutes; rice-based pudding dessert (arroz con leche); candy bars; grain-based snack foods; rice-based snack foods; wheat-based snack foods; beverages made of tea; coffee and tea; fruit teas; instant tea; tea | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 30, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 7, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 21, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |