Drawing for EXPEDITION OCEAN

USPTO serial 77444550

EXPEDITION OCEAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VALLILLO, MELISSA C
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXPEDITION OCEAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James C. Wray

JAMES C. WRAY JAMES C. WRAY1493 CHAIN BRIDGE RD STE 300MC LEAN, VA 22101-5726UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Recordings and DVD'sACTIVE—
025ClothingACTIVE—
041Television programsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 28, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 18, 2009APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Apr 16, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 10, 2009PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2009APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Mar 25, 2009PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 22, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 2, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance