USPTO serial 77444693
MAINCONCEPT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3768186Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 30, 2010
- Examiner
- CARL III, FRED
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAINCONCEPT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Aachen, DE
Aachen, DE
AACHEN, DE
AACHEN, DE
SAN DIEGO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrea L Calvaruso
Andrea L Calvaruso Kelley Drye & Warren LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DATA PROCESSORS AND SOFTWARE FOR USE IN EDITING, COMPOSING, COMPRESSING, DECOMPRESSING, DOWNLOADING, TRANSFERRING AND SHARING AUDIO, VIDEO AND OTHER MULTIMEDIA DATA | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | ADVICE IN THE FIELD OF DATA PROCESSING; TECHNICAL CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF DATA PROCESSING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF AUDIO, VIDEO AND MULTIMEDIA DATA VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND PROFESSIONAL DESIGN OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, FOR CROSS-PLATFORM CONVERSION OF DIGITAL CONTENT, NAMELY, AUDIO, VIDEO AND MULTIMEDIA DATA; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, DESIGN OF NETWORK-BASED SOFTWARE OPERATING SYSTEMS FOR THE INTERNET, INTRANETS, EXTRANETS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, DESIGN OF MULTIMEDIA SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, DESIGN OF INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS; CROSS-PLATFORM CONVERSION OF DIGITAL CONTENT INTO OTHER FORMS OF DIGITAL CONTENT; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING NETWORK WEB HOME PAGES FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING INTERNET WEBSITES AND PORTALS FOR OTHERS; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF DESIGN, SELECTION, IMPLEMENTATION AND USE OF SOFTWARE SYSTEMS FOR OTHERS; UPDATING AND MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS; TESTING, ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF THE GOODS OF OTHERS FOR THE PURPOSE OF CERTIFICATION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 045 | Licensing of computer software | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MAINCONCEPT AG
- Other trademarks owned by MAINCONCEPT AG
- Other trademarks owned by MAINCONCEPT GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by MAINCONCEPT GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by MAINCONCEPT GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named MAINCONCEPT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2021 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Apr 27, 2021 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Apr 26, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 5, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 6, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |