Drawing for WILEY GREEN

USPTO serial 77444931

WILEY GREEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WILEY GREEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher Kelly

CHRISTOPHER KELLY WILEY REIN LLP1776 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-2304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
045Provision of legal servicesACTIVEJan 12, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 11, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 11, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 27, 2012EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 5, 2012GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2012GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2012CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
Aug 23, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 20, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 15, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 15, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 15, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 15, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 15, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 15, 2012CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 18, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 14, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2011CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 31, 2011SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 31, 2011EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 25, 2011IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 25, 2011EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 25, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 25, 2011EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 1, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 24, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 24, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 27, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 26, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 21, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 21, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 19, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 14, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 24, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 24, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 22, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 22, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 22, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 25, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 2, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 28, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 23, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 23, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 23, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance