CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ANYTIME APPS

USPTO serial 77445578

ANYTIME APPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ANYTIME APPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher T. Dejardin

Christopher T. Dejardin Cassan Maclean307 Gilmour StreetOttawa, Ontario, K2P0P7CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029FROZEN APPETIZERS, NAMELY, BATTERED AND BREADED VEGETABLES AND CHEESE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, BREADED OR BATTERED CHEESE STICKS, BALLS, PLANKS AND CUBESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 11, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 16, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 27, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 11, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 11, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 7, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 7, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 11, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 10, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 10, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 15, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 20, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 20, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 30, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 27, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 15, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Apr 14, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance