USPTO serial 77446017
IVDN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IVDN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paula L. Kluksdal
Paula Landholm Kluksdal HawleyTroxell Ennis & Hawley LLP877 W. Main StreetSuite 1000Boise, ID 83702Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | procurement for others of private label surgical disposable goods and equipment for use in veterinary clinics, namely, insulin syringes, IV cannulas, disposable needles, single use syringes, glass syringes, disposable syringes, infusion sets, surgical blades, blood collection sets, single-handed blade remover, plain microscopic slides, cover glass, nonwoven self-adhesive elastic bandages, full cotton self-adhesive elastic bandages, gauze sponges, nonwoven sponges, conforming stretch bandages, elastic bandages, vital soft bandages, abdominal pads, non-adherent pads, laparatomy sponges, cotton tipped applicators/tongue blades, stain sets and replacement reagents, and respiration indicators | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | storage for others of private label surgical disposable goods and equipment for use in veterinary clinics, namely, insulin syringes, IV cannulas, disposable needles, single use syringes, glass syringes, disposable syringes, infusion sets, surgical blades, blood collection sets, single-handed blade remover, plain microscopic slides, cover glass, nonwoven self-adhesive elastic bandages, full cotton self-adhesive elastic bandages, gauze sponges, nonwoven sponges, conforming stretch bandages, elastic bandages, vital soft bandages, abdominal pads, non-adherent pads, laparatomy sponges, cotton tipped applicators/tongue blades, stain sets and replacement reagents, and respiration indicators | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | testing for others of private label surgical disposable goods and equiment for use in veterinary clinics, namely, insulin syringes, IV cannulas, disposable needles, single use syringes, glass syringes, disposable syringes, infusion sets, surgical blades, blood collection sets, single-handed blade remover, plain microscopic slides, cover glass, nonwoven self-adhesive elastic bandages, full cotton self-adhesive elastic bandages, gauze sponges, nonwoven sponges, conforming stretch bandages, elastic bandages, vital soft bandages, abdominal pads, non-adherent pads, laparatomy sponges, cotton tipped applicators/tongue blades, stain sets and replacement reagents, and respiration indicators | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 21, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 19, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 4, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 17, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |