Drawing for BIOFUEL ENERGY

USPTO serial 77446219

BIOFUEL ENERGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIOFUEL ENERGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tracy B. Gray

TRACY B. GRAY HOGAN & HARTSON L.L.P.7930 JONES BRANCH DRIVEATTN: BOX INTELLECTUAL PROPERTYMCLEAN, VA 22102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004Fuels; fuel oil; alcohol and mixed alcohol fuel; bio-diesel fuel; ethanol fuel; and bio-energy, namely, electrical energy, and liquid, solid, and gaseous fuels derived from biomassACTIVE—
039Transportation and storage of fuels and energy; distribution of energy; distribution services in the field of fuel and oil, namely, delivery of fuel and oil, or transmission of fuel and oil through pipelines, trucks, rails, barges and tankersACTIVE—
040Fuel refining; fuel treatment servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 13, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 8, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 8, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 8, 2010EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 13, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 13, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 13, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 19, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 21, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 26, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 26, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 26, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 26, 2009AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 26, 2009IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 25, 2009EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
May 8, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 25, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 29, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 16, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 15, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance