Drawing for ZOO GAMES

USPTO serial 77447423

ZOO GAMES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BROWN, TINA
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZOO GAMES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Michael Hurst

J. Michael Hurst Keating Muething & Klekamp PLLOne East Fourth Street, Suite 1400Cincinnati, OH 45202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer gamesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 2, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 6, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Dec 5, 2011EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Dec 2, 2011EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Dec 2, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 3, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 2, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
May 31, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
May 31, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 13, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 13, 2011NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED
Jan 12, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jan 12, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Dec 2, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Dec 2, 2010DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Dec 2, 2010ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Dec 2, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 26, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 25, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jun 25, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jun 2, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 2, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 1, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 1, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 1, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 10, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 18, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 6, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Feb 6, 2009COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Feb 2, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 2, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 21, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 21, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 21, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 21, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 21, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 27, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jul 29, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 23, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Apr 17, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance