Drawing for DAYPORT

USPTO serial 77447988

DAYPORT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DAYPORT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Todd S. Bontemps

TODD S. BONTEMPS COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP777 6TH ST NWSTE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20001-3706

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising services provided through a global computer network, namely, advertising agencies; promotion agencies, namely, promoting the services of communications companies through the distribution of printed and audio promotional materials and by rendering sales promotion advice; rental of advertising space; business management services for communications companies; business planning and consultation service for communications companies; business information services, namely, providing information to television production companies and online multimedia content publishers regarding business networking and business partnering, and providing market research reports and analysis; business consultation, business management and business information services in the field of subscriptions to multimedia services, namely, cable television; retail and wholesale store and mail order and distributorship services in the field of multimedia educational and entertainment productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 1, 2011MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 1, 2011ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 1, 2011EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 22, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 21, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 19, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 7, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 10, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 23, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 12, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 2, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 17, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance