USPTO serial 77449057
Serial No. 77449057
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 77449057?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Centreville, VA
Centreville, VA
Lorton, VA
Lorton, VA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Educational publications, namely, training manuals in the field of soccer training | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by McKnight, Darren S.
- Other trademarks owned by McKnight, Darren S.
- Other trademarks owned by Pletka, Radovan K.
- Other trademarks owned by Pletka, Radovan K.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 20, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 6, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 3, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 11, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 20, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 26, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 6, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 14, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |