Drawing for BLUEREBA

USPTO serial 77449150

BLUEREBA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHANG, KATHERINE S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLUEREBA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roger N. Behle, Jr.

ROGER N. BEHLE, JR. FOLEY BEZEK BEHLE & CURTIS, LLP575 ANTON BLVD STE 710COSTA MESA, CA 92626-7039UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary and nutritional supplementsACTIVE—
030Sugar substitutes; Natural sweetenerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 18, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 22, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 13, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 13, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 13, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 19, 2011EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 3, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 6, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2011TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 28, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 19, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 23, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 19, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 19, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 17, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 16, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 16, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 16, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 21, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 19, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 19, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 19, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 19, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 19, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 24, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 4, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 21, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 21, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 17, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 15, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 18, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance