USPTO serial 77449229
IDENTITYPAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IDENTITYPAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dale F. Schaller
DALE F SCHALLER2232 S MAIN STREETSUITE 433ANN ARBOR, MI 48103-6938Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer storage devices, namely, blank flash drives; Computer software and hardware for storage and retrieval of medical and personal information from a USB drive; Downloadable software for interactive storage and retrieval of medical, personal and legal information from a USB drive; Medical software for interactive storage and retrieval of medical information for first responder access from a USB drive; USB (universal serial bus) hardware | ABANDONED | Aug 7, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |