Drawing for DNAFFIRM

USPTO serial 77449390

DNAFFIRM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DNAFFIRM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Larry L. Saret

Larry L. Saret Michael Best & Friedrich LLP180 N. Stetson Avenue, Suite 2000Chicago, IL 60601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010A kit for use by members of the public and consisting of swabs for obtaining a sample of cellular material from a person, and further consisting of envelopes for holding the swabs for mailing or other transmission for genetic profiling analysis, such as paternity determinationACTIVE—
044Genetic profiling analysis services rendered to members of the public, namely, analyzing DNA to determine relationships between persons, such as paternity determinationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 2, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 22, 2011GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2011GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 11, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 13, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 13, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 3, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2010GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2010GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 3, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 3, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 3, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 2, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 2, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 29, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 21, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance