USPTO serial 77450069
KANYE WEST'S GLOW IN THE DARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARL III, FRED
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KANYE WEST'S GLOW IN THE DARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brad D. Rose
Brad D. Rose Pryor Cashman LLP7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Dinnerware, china dinnerware, crystal dinnerware, beverageware, and stemware; beverage glassware and drinking glasses; mugs, cups, goblets, bottles sold empty and glass storage jars sold empty; bottle squeegees, vacuum bottles and barware, namely, seltzer bottles; dewar bottles and vessels; drinking vessels and heat-insulated vessels; bottle stands; wine bottle cradles; glass storage jars, insulating jars and cookie jars; non-metal jars for jams and jellies made of earthenware, glass, porcelain and plastic; beer jugs; drinking steins; flasks; coasters, not made of paper and not being table linen, leather coasters and plastic coasters; barware, namely, high ball glasses, shot glasses, cocktail shakers, cork screws, cork holders, bottle openers, tumblers, wine goblets, carafes, decanters, portable coolers for beverages, namely, portable coolers for wine; wine cooler stands, pitchers, buckets and beverage stirrers; insulating sleeve holders for beverage cans; foam drink holders; bread boxes; household containers for foods; containers for household or kitchen use not made of precious metal; all purpose portable household containers; non-electric kitchen containers not made of precious metal; portable plastic containers for storing household and kitchen goods; canteens; portable coolers, portable beverage coolers and portable beverage dispensers; portable ice chests for food and beverages; thermal insulated containers for food and beverages; thermal insulated tote bags for food and beverages; thermal insulated wrap for cans to keep the contents cold or hot; serviette holders; serviette rings not of precious metal; lunch boxes and pails; tea kettles; cooking and kitchen utensils, namely, cutting boards, wire baskets, steamer baskets, kitchen and serving ladles, pots, metal and glass pans, pie pans, baking dishes, crumb brushes, brushes for basting meat and dishwashing brushes, dish drying racks, oven to table racks, spice racks, poultry rings, recipe boxes, cruets not of precious metal, and cruet stands for oil or vinegar not of precious metal; non-electric coffee servers, tea services, tea infusers, tea balls, tea pots, and non-electric kitchen containers, all of the foregoing not of precious metal; bowls, plates, dishes and dish covers; saucers; serving platters; serving trays not of precious metal; trivets; salt and pepper shakers; toothpicks and toothpick holders; canister sets; napkin holders; napkin rings not of precious metals; table placard holders not of precious metal; boxes for dispensing paper towels; hair brushes and combs; holders for hair brushes and combs; bathroom and beauty products and accessories, namely, dental floss, tooth brushes and toothbrush holders, cup holders, bath brushes, sponges, natural sea sponges, loofah sponges, eyebrow brushes, nail brushes, shaving brushes, shaving brush holders and stands, squeegees for shaving brushes, plastic bath racks, toilet brushes and toilet brush holders; lotion holders, namely, lotion dispensers; soap boxes, brackets, containers, dishes, dispensers and holders; cotton balls and cotton ball dispensers; cosmetic brushes and clothes brushes; clothes drying racks and clothes pins; baby bathtubs; bathroom glass holder not of precious metal; earring organizer board; candle holders, candle rings and candlesticks not of precious metal; candle snuffers; non-electric candelabras, not of precious metal; glass boxes, non-metal decorative boxes in the nature of ceramic tissue box covers, plastic juice box covers, recipe boxes and sandwich boxes; baskets made of straw, cloth, wicker and wood; fitted picnic baskets; plant and flower pots, bowls, baskets and syringes; plastic lids for plant pots; pot cleaning brushes; scraping and scrubbing brushes; vases; figurines made of china, crystal, earthenware, glass, and porcelain; wastepaper baskets; trash containers for household use; non-metal piggy banks; souvenir and decorative plates; perfume burners; perfume vaporizers and sprayers sold empty; shoe horns; shoe brushes, dusting brushes, floor brushes and fireplace brushes; golf brush and brushes for billiard tables; cleaning cloths, polishing cloths, furniture dusters, dust pans and brooms; ironing boards, shaped covers for ironing boards, and holders for household irons | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 14, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 12, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 20, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 16, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 21, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 15, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |