CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for GFK ENHANCED DATA GUIDANCE ENGINE

USPTO serial 77450159

GFK ENHANCED DATA GUIDANCE ENGINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, JULIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GFK ENHANCED DATA GUIDANCE ENGINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Claudia A. Smith

Claudia A. Smith Wilmer Cutler Pickering and Dorr LLP399 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Market research consulting services in the fields of health care and pharmaceuticals; conducting business and market research surveys and opinion polls; business consultation; developing and analyzing market research data and statistical researchACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 14, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 7, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 23, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 17, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 11, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 20, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 18, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 18, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 18, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 29, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 23, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 30, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 21, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance