USPTO serial 77450179
CAPPUCCINO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CAPPUCCINO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LOS ANGELES, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas I. Rozsa
THOMAS I. ROZSA ROZSA LAW GROUP LC18757 BURBANK BLVD STE 220TARZANA, CA 91356-3346UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | MEN'S, BOY'S, AND CHILDREN'S WEARING APPAREL, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, TANK TOPS, WOVEN SHIRTS, SWEATERS, CARDIGANS, VESTS, JACKETS, PANTS, SWEATPANTS, JEANS, SHORTS, HATS, CAPS, COATS, SCARVES, NECKERCHIEFS, NECK BANDS, WRIST BANDS, HEAD BANDS, GLOVES, BELTS WORN WITH CLOTHING, PAJAMAS, SHOES, SOCKS, UNDERWEAR, SWIM WEAR, AND TRUNKS; AND WOMEN'S, GIRL'S, AND CHILDREN'S WEARING APPAREL, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, TANK TOPS, WOVEN SHIRTS, SWEATERS, CARDIGANS, VESTS, JACKETS, PANTS, SWEATPANTS, JEANS, SHORTS, HATS, CAPS, COATS, BELTS WORN WITH CLOTHING, SCARVES, NECKERCHIEFS, NECK BANDS, WRIST BANDS, HEAD BANDS, GLOVES, PAJAMAS, SHOES, SOCKS, UNDERWEAR, FOUNDATION GARMENTS, PANTYHOSE, TEDDIES, BRAS, SKIRTS, DRESSES, BLOUSES, SWIM WEAR, AND BIKINIS | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |