CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for THE MOYAD METHOD

USPTO serial 77451449

THE MOYAD METHOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAUFMAN, LAURIE R
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE MOYAD METHOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marnie Wright Barnhorst

MARNIE WRIGHT BARNHORST THE TRADEMARK GROUP, APLC1200 PROSPECT ST STE G100LA JOLLA, CA 92037-3608UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005nutritional supplements, meal replacement barsACTIVE—
030nutritional food products, namely, breakfast cereals, bread, bagels, pastry and bakery products, honey, cereal based energy bars, cereal-based snack foods, cereal derived food bars, corn-based snack foods, crackers, granola, granola-based snack bars, grain-based snack foods, grain-based food bars containing soy, dried fruits and nuts; muesli, muffins, oatmeal, pita bread, rice cakes, rice crackers, rice-based snack foods, rolled oats and wheat, shakes, wheat-based snack foods, pasta, rice, packaged meal kits consisting primarily of pasta or rice, prepared entrees consisting primarily of pasta or riceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 21, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 21, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 9, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 9, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 9, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 19, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 24, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 4, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 18, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 17, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 19, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 2, 2008NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 1, 2008AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 30, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 21, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 22, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance