Drawing for HOCKEYTUBE

USPTO serial 77451465

HOCKEYTUBE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOCKEYTUBE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Audio and video broadcasting services over the Internet, namely, uploading, posting, showing, displaying, tagging and electronically transmitting information, audio, and video clips in the field of hockeyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2009MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 21, 2009ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 20, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2009UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Oct 16, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 2, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2009UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Sep 28, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 8, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 5, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 4, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 4, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 3, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 8, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 30, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 26, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 18, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 31, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 5, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 15, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 15, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 14, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 14, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 14, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 14, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 22, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance